Dispute Resolution Hotline: Limits under Articles 226 and 227: Supreme Court’s Dictum on High Courts’ Jurisdiction over Arbitral Orders

Limits under Articles 226 and 227: Supreme Court’s Dictum on High Courts’ Jurisdiction over Arbitral Orders

This article was first published in www.lexology.com (February, 06, 2025).

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) does not specify remedies to parties before courts, against procedural orders of the arbitral tribunal. In certain cases, aggrieved parties have invoked High Courts’ writ and supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. However, this has often led to a debate between arbitral autonomy and judicial intervention.

Recently, the Supreme Court of India, in Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd.,[i] ruled on the applicable standard for interference by High Courts in a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. While allowing the appeal against the High Court’s order, the Supreme Court held that High Courts may interfere with an order of an arbitral tribunal only if such an order is ex-facie perverse.

Please click here for our detailed article.

Authors

- Shruti Dhonde, Shweta Sahu and Arjun Gupta

You can direct your queries or comments to the relevant member.

Disclaimer

The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This hotline does not constitute a legal opinion and may contain information generated using various artificial intelligence (AI) tools or assistants, including but not limited to our in-house tool, NaiDA. We strive to ensure the highest quality and accuracy of our content and services. Nishith Desai Associates is committed to the responsible use of AI tools, maintaining client confidentiality, and adhering to strict data protection policies to safeguard your information.

This hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a spam email. You have received this email because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a email cannot be considered spam if it contains the sender’s contact information, which this email does. In case this email doesn’t concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.